Appellate Court Opinions
Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.
35,531 Appellate Court Opinions
State v. Eury
State v. Felton
Admission of video recordings; plain error
State v. Gray
Malicious maiming; AISBI; jury instructions; carrying a concealed weapon; various aggravating factors; IAC claim.
State v. Maness
ineffective assistance of counsel, motion for appropriate relief, possession of a firearm by a felon
State v. McLendon-Brown
Maximum sentence term; obtaining property by false pretenses; sufficiency of indictment
State v. Molina
Indictment; Fatal Variance; Sufficiency of the Evidence
State v. Pugh
Motion to dismiss; Robbery with a firearm
State v. Rogers
False pretenses; fatal variance; misrepresentation proven at trial varied materially from that charged in indictment
State v. Sellers
Factual basis for acceptance of plea
State v. Shaw
Self-defense jury instructions; right to remain silent; double jeopardy
State v. Stasiv
False pretenses- illegal wire transfer
State v. White
Voluntary manslaughter; Rule of Evidence 404(a); Rules of Evidence 401 and 403; ineffective assistance of counsel.
State v. York
Joinder; doctrine of recent possession
Steele v City of Durham
Negligence; Legal duty owed by City to maintain municipal sidewalk beside State-owned highway; Genuine issues of material fact and contributory negligence precluded summary judgment.
Whitehurst v. Alexander Cnty.,
Zoning; Interpretation and application of ordinance; Expansion of nonconforming use; Petitioner's challenge to Board of Adjustment's dismissal of zoning violation issued against respondent.
Williams v. Chaney
Modification of child custody
Yates Constr. Co., Inc. v Bostic
Appellate Jurisdiction; Rule 3; Business Court
Supreme Court Opinions Filed January 29, 2016
Irving v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ.
Wreck allegedly caused by negligence of driver of school activity bus; whether school activity buses are covered by the State Tort Claims Act under N.C.G.S. 143-300.1.
Lloyd v. Bailey
Action against county sheriff for wrongful discharge based on political considerations; whether sheriff's department employees are 'county employees' entitled to protection under N.C.G.S. 153A-99; whether plaintiff's dismissal violated his rights under the federal or state constitutions; whether summary judgment should have been granted for the sheriff.