N.C. CONST. art. I, § 24; coerced jury verdict; standard of review; expert witness; opinion evidence; Rule 404(b) other crimes evidence

Standard of proof, findings of fact, criminal contempt order

Reportable conviction for sex offender registry

Service of process

Public use or benefit; Eminent domain

Summary Judgment;
Statute of Limitations;
Contract Under Seal

summary judgment, wrongful termination, age discrimination, affidavits

Motion to Suppress; Anonymous tip; Reasonable suspicion

Motion to Dismiss - Sufficiency of the evidence of maintaining a vehicle for keeping or selling methamphetamine; Jury Instructions - G.S. 90-87(15); Sentencing - Double Jeopardy

Jury selection, voir dire, peremptory challenge

Workers' Compensation; Refusal to Renew

Whether plaintiffs whose claims were dismissed with prejudice before a final judgment was taken as to all parties should be liable for payment of costs of defending the action that were incurred after their claim was dismissed; N.C. R. Civ. P. 54(b)

Trial court's grant of summary judgment for plaintiff on its claim of materialmen's lien under N.C.G.S. ? 44A-8; whether there were genuine issues of material fact.

Whether the trial court committed plain error in admitting lay testimony identifying defendant as the perpetrator of a crime based primarily on original surveillance video footage not introduced at trial

Whether there was a fatal variance between the indictment under which defendant was charged and the trial court's instructions to the jury

Whether a DWI charge should be dismissed on double jeopardy grounds because of DMV's previous one-year suspension of defendant's commercial driver?s license following his arrest for DWI

Plain error review; whether a defendant convicted of first-degree statutory sexual offense with a child under N.C.G.S. ? 14-27.4(a)(1) should have that conviction vacated because of a variance between the language in the indictment and in the trial court's instructions to the jury

Denial of defendant's MAR following his convictions; whether the trial court abused its discretion by not holding an evidentiary hearing to consider defendant's claim that he did not receive a fair trial because of juror misconduct